Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory108GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 108GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory101.9 GB free of 108 GB
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 01:57
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 34.8
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 130
41% 77 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 469
43% 362 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 215GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 128
SusWrite 120
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 2.3
388% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 108GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 12288 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 228
18% 228 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback