Casper EXCALIBUR GAMING E700

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR GAMING E700 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER H310H5 M4 001
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180725
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '22 at 23:16
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 515 61% 471 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.3% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 167 Parallax 95.9 90% 124 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 98.8 Splatting 91.3 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB 3,525 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231800WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 135 112 135 113 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 640 Write 617 Mixed 580 SusWrite 147 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 38 125% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 640 DQ Write 594 DQ Mixed 538 426% 591 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 189%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 188 173 190 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 175 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 184 105% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.9% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.3 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 22.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXCALIBUR GAMING E700 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Casper EXCALIBUR GAMING E700

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	9x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	8x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	8x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GBBench 78%, 11,560 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 78%, 2,310 samples	6x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	6x
3200 C16 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 42,084 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16