HP EliteBook 1030 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 1030 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FB
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220402
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 21:39
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m7-6Y75
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 140
56% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 205
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 8
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000H1 512GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 257 260 264 280 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 383
Write 377
Mixed 345
SusWrite 270
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 39.3
119% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 344
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 1030 G1 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 1030 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback