Lenovo 90Q80004US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90Q80004US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3715
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201216
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 05:17
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 312
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1098
104% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,768
109% 1,768 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 325
Reflection 383
Parallax 322
265% 344 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 247
Splatting 175
202% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 215%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,994
Write 1,454
Mixed 940
323% 1,463 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 54.4
194% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 970
737% 998 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
906GB free
Firmware: CC64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 180 180 184 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 106
Write 115
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 183
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Tigo LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 27.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q80004US Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90Q80004US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $896
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback