Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2288G 132 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 81.2 1-Core 112 2-Core 225 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 791 73% 607 Pts	64-Core 1,206 75% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 1,749 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 517.40 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	131% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 174 Parallax 178 143% 176 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 157 Splatting 144 130% 162 fps
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 137%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC CL SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00-2000 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10104122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 1018 1052 975 633 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,531 Write 1,721 Mixed 1,281 SusWrite 931 307% 1,366 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 55.2 191% 72.1 MB/s	DQ Read 972 DQ Write 668 DQ Mixed 808 606% 816 MB/s
Poor: 171% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 306%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 32TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 86 48 47 58 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.79% Terrible	Read 62.7 Write 110 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 52 14% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 0.4 6% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 3.2 DQ Write 57.2 DQ Mixed 0.3 9% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 8.79% Great: 80%
Samsung MZQLB3T8HALS-00007 4TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 301% 3TB free Firmware: EDA5302Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2102 2093 2105 2094 2044 1929 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	315% Outstanding	Read 1,892 Write 1,613 Mixed 1,306 SusWrite 2061 387% 1,718 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 66.2 230% 88.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,046 DQ Write 838 DQ Mixed 912 690% 932 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 315% Great: 369%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 26.4 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 38.1 SC Mixed 25.4 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

CPU
Xeon E-2288GIntelBench 97%, 132 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	1x

SSD
MZQLB3T8HALS-00007 4TBSamsungBench 301%, 51 samples	1x

RAM
M391A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 91%, 52 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16