HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory1.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 01:21
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 44.9
30% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 104
8% 70.9 Pts
64-Core 78.2
5% 78.2 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2490 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.1% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 54.4
50% 59.3 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 50.1
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 50 42 42 41 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 171
Write 151
Mixed 125
SusWrite 51.9
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 13.3
31% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 112
95% 138 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
706GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 84.6
Mixed 75.6
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
179% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 BA ID:01 BA 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback