PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3646h |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20091022 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 08 '22 at 01:21 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 2490 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 50 42 42 41 38 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:01 BA ID:01 BA 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 227x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 49x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 37x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 231x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 62x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 32x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 23x |
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples | 10x |
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $115 |