TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Besstar UM340

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemBesstar UM340  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM340
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 21:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 170
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 480
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 55.6%
 Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 15.6
9% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 9.07%
 Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 1TB
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: J00fHf11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 380 382 375 381 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 387
Write 383
Mixed 324
SusWrite 376
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 21.4
80% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 193
138% 175 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 70.4%
 Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 58.4%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical UM340 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM340

CPU
Ryzen 5 3450U Vega Mobile GfxAMDBench 49%, 2,814 samples10x
GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples10x
SSD
OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GBKingstonBench 175%, 443 samples6x
PX-512M9PeG 512GBPlextorBench 192%, 900 samples1x
KingFast 1TBBench 95%, 2,943 samples1x
RAM
CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 84%, 292 samples4x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples2x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback