Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9220C RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 288 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 40.8 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 51.1 27% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 49.5 8-Core 38.8 6% 44.2 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 39EA) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 18.40.23.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GB 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 98 68 109 80 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 340 Write 144 Mixed 156 SusWrite 108 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 10.2 39% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 132 101% 138 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-9220C RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 29%, 288 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	3x

SSD
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	3x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16