Asus K95VJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K95VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K95VJ
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130124
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 23:25
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 39.3
25% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 42
8-Core 46.7
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 45
3% 45 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 10CC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 2.5 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 228 101 133 186 188 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 263
Write 217
Mixed 241
SusWrite 177
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 10.5
35% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 29
28% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K95VJ Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K95VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback