TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 21:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 113
45% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 166
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 41.6%
 Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 8D97)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 47.5
45% 58.9 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 46.4
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 44.1%
 Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 97 136 149 161 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 129
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 81.5%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 22.9%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples21x
A4-4000 APUAMD  $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples17x
A4-6300 APUAMD  $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples11x
GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples10x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples8x
SU650 120GBAdata  $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples4x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples3x
RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX  $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback