Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemSamsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 18:10
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 95.4
43% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 134
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 111 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 225
Write 208
Mixed 184
SusWrite 117
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 20
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 144
118% 168 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
250GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 78.1
Write 71.7
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 76.1
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CF8 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB
1066, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511/RV711/E3411

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback