Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150924
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '22 at 17:38
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 144 56% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 287 38% 283 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 45.1 Parallax 5 4% 18.3 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 8 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 176 169 165 128 128 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53% Above average	Read 261 Write 163 Mixed 235 SusWrite 154 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 23.7 74% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 181 149% 210 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 84%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 51GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 299 301 300 279 264 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 266 Write 332 Mixed 245 SusWrite 287 64% 283 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 30.8 84% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 337 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 316 240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 124%
Hua722050cla330 39M4517 42C0468IBM 500GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 70GB free Firmware: JP2OA3GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 125 130 126 126 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 110 Write 122 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 123 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 77%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 125GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 71 70 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 104 Write 111 Mixed 85 SusWrite 71.4 69% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 79%
Fujitsu MHY2250BH 250GB-$31 1,194 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 20GB free Firmware: 0000000B SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 51.9 Write 34.7 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 33.1 26% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	322x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	284x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	141x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	107x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	43x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16