Acidanthera MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAcidanthera MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 14:12
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 499
50% 409 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 136
Parallax 235
91% 161 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 120
Splatting 180
140% 171 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,044
Write 4,259
Mixed 4,200
933% 4,167 MB/s
4K Read 242
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 156
657% 190 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 472
360% 490 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
0GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,569
Write 1,778
Mixed 1,388
353% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 47.2
156% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 562
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 311
245% 351 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
254GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 66
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 37.5
42% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 37.4
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acidanthera MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $715
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback