Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X+ Killer  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 126
52% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 104
Parallax 162
88% 125 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 121
Splatting 73
75% 93.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 69 55 63 55 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 456
Write 342
Mixed 114
SusWrite 84.4
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 20.8
94% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 102
110% 182 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
77GB free
Firmware: BBCOC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 59
Write 38.3
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 39.6
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB9N-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X+ Killer Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback