Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemSupermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-7LN4F
Memory89 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 05 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 139
57% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 572
49% 422 Pts
64-Core 2461
152% 2461 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.37 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK480MAV 480GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 300 301 297 301 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 356
Write 348
Mixed 304
SusWrite 303
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 27.4
96% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 184
175% 273 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7EFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7EFR4C-H9 HMT31GR7EFR4C-H9 Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 Micron 36JSF1G72P... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 31.2
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Supermicro X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $101
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback