Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '22 at 05:27
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 815
81% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 189
Parallax 184
147% 185 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 187
Splatting 124
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1121 873 877 871 862 859 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,679
Write 2,498
Mixed 1,881
SusWrite 910
446% 1,992 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 96.9
324% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 1,105
826% 1,106 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 313%
Great: 355%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
125GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1167 1003 1006 1006 1007 1011 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,338
Write 1,341
Mixed 1,285
SusWrite 1,033
282% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 74.3
257% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,164
872% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 248%
Great: 297%
Neo Forza NFS011SA31T-6007000 1TB
766GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 435 435 434 429 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 454
Mixed 404
SusWrite 436
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 34.6
156% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 50.8
94% 180 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
3 1TB SSD 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 44 75 76 76 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 516
Write 461
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 130
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 20.7
69% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 0.7
75% 176 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 40.8
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback