Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '22 at 11:26
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Memory 79.3 1-Core 137 2-Core 272 88% 163 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 1,045 94% 794 Pts	64-Core 2,185 135% 2,185 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$890 166,050 User benchmarks, average bench 206% Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	206% Outstanding	Lighting 301 Reflection 273 Parallax 313 246% 296 fps	MRender 347 Gravity 253 Splatting 183 205% 261 fps
Poor: 169% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 227%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 916 Write 1076 Mixed 400 177% 797 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 69.8 222% 85.8 MB/s	DQ Read 808 DQ Write 887 DQ Mixed 721 578% 805 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$110 170,497 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 896GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 432 Write 460 Mixed 345 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 99.8 4K Mixed 41.5 150% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 362 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 122%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$140 33,091 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 989GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 503 Write 453 Mixed 429 103% 462 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 56 191% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 359 271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$62 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 143GB free Firmware: M3CR033 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 511 Write 474 Mixed 410 104% 465 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 53.6 179% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 291 239% 342 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,552 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 00ee Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 16.6 Write 10.2 Mixed 8.5 14% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.3 90% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB 38,265 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 45.3 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 40.2 120% 42 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 38.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	30	144	27"	1280 720	SAM707A LC27G5xT

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 1,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $160

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $299Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	312x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $265Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	259x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $190Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	164x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $350Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	162x
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	146x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $130Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	141x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	65x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $59Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	57x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $49Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	88x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $50Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $959

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98	Nvidia RTX 3070 $568	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164	Nvidia RTX 3050 $298	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $160

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)