Dell Precision M6700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M6700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0JWMFY
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 18:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 471
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000M
Dell(1028 053F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.2% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 47.2
38% 49.2 fps
MRender 55
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 51.5
42% 52 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU900 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 70 41 37 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 425
Write 69
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 55.7
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 21.9
68% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 82
86% 148 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 112%
Samsung PM830 128GB
48GB free
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 280 255 242 221 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 417
Write 306
Mixed 273
SusWrite 238
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 17.5
63% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 129
110% 168 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6700 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback