Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory50.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 18:15
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 119
2-Core 231
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 838
78% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,680
104% 1,680 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
Asus(1043 056A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 101
52% 77.9 fps
Gravity 68
Splatting 51.3
52% 59.7 fps
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 708 700 706 710 711 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,297
Write 1,818
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 747
353% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 71.7
229% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 469
DQ Mixed 662
484% 640 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 237%
Great: 355%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
179GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 97 137 99 100 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1218
Write 951
Mixed 876
SusWrite 204
181% 812 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 54.8
184% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 272
310% 527 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 148%
Great: 255%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
174GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 73.5
Write 71.8
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 77
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
198GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 178 179 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 131
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 178
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 109%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
114GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 99 101 98 96 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 163
Write 142
Mixed 105
SusWrite 105
168% 129 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
135% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK00 14TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 3.3 3.4 8.5 19 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 205
Write 185
Mixed 169
SusWrite 15.3
182% 144 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 1.4
461% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 3.9
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
327% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 120%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 136
Write 165
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 118
171% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
128GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 97 100 96 77 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 103
Write 112
Mixed 64
SusWrite 91.9
125% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 62
MC Write 65.3
MC Mixed 56.5
175% 61.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 25.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 154%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,675
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback