TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP HPE-410tr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-410tr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 13:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 156
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 338
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 66.9%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Device(1B0A 9083) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 1.74%
 Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hi-level Elite Series 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 220 216 213 216 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 239
Write 229
Mixed 223
SusWrite 218
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 8.7
69% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 13.5
52% 115 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 49.9%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5474-028.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 38.4%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HPE-410tr Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP HPE-410tr

CPU
Core i7 870Intel  $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples6x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples3x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples2x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples1x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples2x
Elite Series 256GBHi-levelBench 75%, 67 samples1x
RAM
99U5471-025.A00LF 9801 99U5471-025.A00LF 8000CE80 9801 99U5471-025.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 42%, 3 samples2x
16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 2 samples2x
99U5474-028.A00LF 4x4GBUnknownBench 38%, 29 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback