QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 10:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 122
48% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 462
44% 363 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 517.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 84.6
Reflection 143
Parallax 225
69% 151 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 194
Splatting 149
152% 192 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 188 222 221 242 245 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 153 153 162 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 155
Mixed 77
SusWrite 154
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 82%
External USB3.0 2TB
886GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 201 235 235 244 245 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
135% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 245
Mixed 237
SusWrite 224
177% 238 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 3.9
668% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 135%
Great: 137%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 14 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15616 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 16.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback