Pcspecialist Vortex G30

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemPcspecialist Vortex G30  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H610M S2H DDR4
Memory2.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 140
2-Core 245
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 571
66% 515 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 51.8
42% 53.1 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 45.2
42% 51.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 512GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0806A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,600
Write 1,298
Mixed 1,000
288% 1,299 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 22.8
136% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 554
500% 760 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 29.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vortex G30 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Pcspecialist Vortex G30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback