| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock G965M-S (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090401 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 01 '22 at 16:21 |
| Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
34.1%
Below average
|
31% 49.4 Pts
|
16% 124 Pts
|
8% 125 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 470-$126
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.6%
Below average
|
38% 58.9 fps
|
42% 53 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Xraydisk 240GB 240GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 190507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 162 158 153 163 158 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
41% 182 MB/s
|
91% 30.5 MB/s
|
27% 38.7 MB/s
|
|
Xraydisk 512GB 512GB
300GB free
Firmware: T0519A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 107 18 105 56 18 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
33% 146 MB/s
|
56% 19.3 MB/s
|
23% 37.6 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
146GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 71 70 70 71 70 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
45% 61.4 MB/s
|
109% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
15% 5.37 GB/s
|
15% 5.33 GB/s
|
23% 171 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G965M-S Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock G965M-S
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| G965 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 13 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 440NvidiaBench 4%, 14,286 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $50 |