Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C15B
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 134
50% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 178
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2109) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 5.6
3% 6.27 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08979
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 380 359 382 398 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61% Good
Read 346
Write 324
Mixed 329
SusWrite 370
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 16.8
55% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 165
126% 168 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
109GB free
Firmware: AM0P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 84 83 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 70.4
Write 77
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 82.5
47% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback