Asrock Z590 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 231%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 231%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 08:15
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 176
2-Core 349
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 703
8-Core 1,156
114% 929 Pts
64-Core 1,756
109% 1,756 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
MSI(1462 3882) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 5075 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 318
Parallax 363
293% 346 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 290
Splatting 196
139% 162 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 213%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 152 144 143 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 369
Write 176
Mixed 157
SusWrite 148
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 32.9
127% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 114
103% 158 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 89%
Team T253A3001T 1TB
188GB free
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 206 200 209 207 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 368
Write 325
Mixed 321
SusWrite 207
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 29.8
129% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 49.4
70% 129 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 102%
WL4000GSA6472 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: WD04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 153 153 152 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 157
Write 140
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 153
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 209 212 207 211 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 133
Write 122
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 208
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
475GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 174 174 175 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 162
Mixed 81
SusWrite 175
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 120 120 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 121
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
975GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 85.6
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 92.9
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
123% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 114 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 89
SusWrite 112
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4400C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 35.5
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 49.2
SC Mixed 35.4
104% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590 OC Formula Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $602
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback