Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170830
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateOct 28 '17 at 11:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 678
60% 511 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 40.2
38% 43.6 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.8
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 501
Write 353
Mixed 348
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 9.99
65% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 45.5
49% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 97%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
163GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 54.3
Mixed 64.3
48% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 32.5
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback