Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Memory 16.2 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 119 36% 70.2 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 203 24% 186 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 505B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4727 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 2.2 5% 3.57 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 9 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 283 308 306 309 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 649 Write 694 Mixed 380 SusWrite 320 114% 511 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 28.7 70% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 174 130% 174 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 5.9 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 350 11% 350 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	4x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	4x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	3x
LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA 256GBBench 113%, 2,581 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	3x
HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 68%, 2,486 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16