Toshiba SATELLITE C70-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '22 at 14:35
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 2020M 9,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 57.6 2-Core 77.9 41% 64 Pts	4-Core 84.4 8-Core 90 12% 87.2 Pts	64-Core 89 6% 89 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA80) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.46% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 390 385 382 383 400 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 374 Write 335 Mixed 328 SusWrite 387 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 16.1 74% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 47.7 68% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 10.9 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C70-A Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70-A

CPU
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	13x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	10x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	21x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	18x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SE800 240GBSuneastBench 53%, 69 samples	3x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GBSamsungBench 40%, 104 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16