Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 77 2-Core 118 58% 91.9 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 183 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 17F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.83 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 435 Write 394 Mixed 45.2 64% 291 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 24.9 86% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 125 134% 223 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.4 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	153x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	11x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	9x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	8x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	7x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	5x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16