Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 03:03
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 315
38% 293 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 123
Parallax 122
101% 123 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 128
Splatting 95.9
88% 109 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 291 372 409 414 387 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 427
Mixed 393
SusWrite 353
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 43.8
146% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 293
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397
156GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 316 370 396 386 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 427
Mixed 338
SusWrite 355
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 34.3
121% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 175
179% 289 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 111%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 119 118 118 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 118
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
614GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 106 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 104
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 61 61 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 60.3
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $971
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback