MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 22:41
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 71.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 306
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 827
85% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.9.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 82.3
Reflection 128
Parallax 155
67% 122 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 85.7
Splatting 144
111% 135 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 103
Mixed 166
49% 228 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 14.2
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 75
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 39.6
35% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
157GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.5
Write 27
Mixed 7.5
12% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
hp v212w 16GB
14GB free, PID a240
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15
Write 1.3
Mixed 6.8
8% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback