Onda A68V+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOnda A68V+  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda A68V+
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 15:28
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 43.9
18% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 63.9
8% 60.2 Pts
64-Core 62.6
4% 62.6 Pts
Poor: 18% Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E60) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 11.5
6% 9.47 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 9
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 237
Write 99.3
Mixed 108
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 7.1
30% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 34.8
44% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 93%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.8
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.9
9% 9.13 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMT8G04UCL116P-PBC Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 550
7% 550 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68V+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Onda A68V+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback