Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory4.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 04:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 352
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 6.2
5% 13.4 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.5
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 27 32 38 44 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 497
Write 140
Mixed 184
SusWrite 51.5
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 22.6
97% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 158
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
789GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 116 115 112 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 75.3
Write 64.7
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 115
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback