Standard AHV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 31% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemStandard AHV  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL HURONRIVER
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 00:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 21,622,626 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 21.5
2-Core 43.5
30% 42 Pts
4-Core 76.8
8-Core 106
12% 91.2 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1297 2020) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 60 324 330 310 305 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 209%
SSD 512GB 512GB
213GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 385 355 333 318 327 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 408
Write 365
Mixed 289
SusWrite 350
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 8.1
43% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 80.9
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 15.3
34% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SNOAMOO BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Standard AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback