MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$189
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 178
2-Core 354
108% 205 Pts
4-Core 701
8-Core 1,344
122% 1,022 Pts
64-Core 1,645
102% 1,645 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
MSI(1462 3991) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 144
Parallax 330
124% 209 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 164
Splatting 181
158% 196 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 129%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850X 1TB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4264 4460 4486 4523 2464 1221 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Wd_black SN850X 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 6202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4009 3948 3998 2277 1693 1480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 4 12TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 354 357 352 362 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 291
Write 218
Mixed 136
SusWrite 356
183% 250 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 3
916% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 187%
Great: 212%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
6TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 190 186 191 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 28
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 25.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback