Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory0.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 11:47
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 112
45% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 135
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Acer(1025 108F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.47% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 13.6
10% 12.2 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 12
Splatting 8.5
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.47%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 104 109 110 99 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 272
Write 132
Mixed 163
SusWrite 101
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 10.4
61% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 102
87% 129 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 47 51 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 10.4
Write 48.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 54
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8213.C8FD1 Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 0.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback