Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Huananzhi Gaming TF (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF Gaming
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '22 at 10:50
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 841 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 208 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 820 73% 617 Pts	64-Core 1,854 115% 1,854 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.8.2 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 110 Parallax 172 88% 130 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 132 Splatting 75.9 80% 101 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 94%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-1TB 1TB 2,390 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0312A SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 202 81 905 320 1151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 1,108 Write 122 Mixed 216 SusWrite 565 110% 502 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 9.3 71% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 80.4 78% 129 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 270%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 4x8GB 430 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	117% Outstanding	MC Read 55.1 MC Write 42 MC Mixed 42.6 133% 46.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 19.4 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

SSD
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	3x
HS-SSD-E2000 256GBBench 161%, 214 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GBMicronBench 55%, 6 samples	2x
M393B1K70BH1-CH9 4x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 36 samples	2x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	1x

Value: 30% - Below average

Total price: $203