Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1620 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200902
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 09:47
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680R v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 733
65% 550 Pts
64-Core 3,235
200% 3,235 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,241
Write 1,014
Mixed 1,004
242% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 48.6
155% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 401
322% 466 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
111GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 147 147 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 476
Write 440
Mixed 364
SusWrite 175
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 36.6
124% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 171
171% 277 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83%
Great: 108%
HP 1205GB MLC PCIe ioDrive2 for ProLiant Servers 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 299 300 301 301 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 346
Write 302
Mixed 316
SusWrite 292
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 38.7
129% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 247
204% 296 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 86%
Great: 226%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 1072 1089 1041 270 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,174
Mixed 985
SusWrite 724
238% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 49.8
163% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 322
290% 456 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 173%
Great: 236%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
589GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 171 167 166 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 186
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 167
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 184 185 184 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 169
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 184
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.8% Above average
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.7
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback