Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30% Poor	Memory 52.7 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 43.3 28% 40.8 Pts	4-Core 44.7 8-Core 44.7 6% 44.7 Pts	64-Core 39 2% 39 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 2111) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.01A12 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 38.6 Write 40.9 Mixed 32 28% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 14GB free Firmware: 2AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 100 Write 15.4 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 56.7 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GB 2,672 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	10x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
P3-128 128GBBench 63%, 3,189 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

RAM
99U5428-046.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 388 samples	1x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 2,672 samples	1x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $259