Foxconn G31MXP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn G31MXP  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 22:40
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 90.8
46% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 170
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 43.6
27% 35.5 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 28.3
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 76 73 85 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 119
Write 161
Mixed 146
SusWrite 81.2
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 8.1
58% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 8.4
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 35.6
30% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31MXP Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn G31MXP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback