Intel NUC11PABi3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PAHi3
MotherboardIntel NUC11PABi3  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 17:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 230
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 325
41% 313 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 105A) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5671
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 62.4
41% 54.5 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 47.1
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 347 324 84 132 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 394
Write 357
Mixed 49
SusWrite 197
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 1
62% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR21D4S15HAG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 13.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11PABi3 Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback