HP 245 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP 245 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85B1
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 16:47
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 109
44% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 259
28% 225 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 85B1) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.50.30.05
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
9% 5.6 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 960GB
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 304 306 305 297 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 338
Write 237
Mixed 258
SusWrite 300
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 10.4
44% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 97.6
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 41.9
61% 110 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-052.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 245 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 245 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback