Intel GrossePoint Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel GrossePoint
MotherboardIntel GrossePoint Server  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 128
59% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 243
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Visilink 120GB 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 906XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 196 53 17 28 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 217
Write 193
Mixed 172
SusWrite 67.9
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 10.9
61% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 1.1
16% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
220GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 81 77 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76.9
Write 72.6
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 80
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GrossePoint Server Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel GrossePoint Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback