Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 128 2-Core 253 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 686 71% 572 Pts	64-Core 686 42% 686 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 49.1 Parallax 55.7 34% 48.9 fps	MRender 48.1 Gravity 42.4 Splatting 34.1 33% 41.5 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3512GNTD 512GB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 180% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFME0.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1123 Write 1,752 Mixed 1,314 315% 1,396 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 63.3 216% 78.4 MB/s	DQ Read 846 DQ Write 744 DQ Mixed 904 648% 832 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 239%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GIGA-BYTE Co Ltd GP-GR26C16S8K2HU416 2x8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 25.1 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 27.5 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	118x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	109x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 2x8GBGBench 91%, 4,745 samples	56x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	50x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16