bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1718 x 859 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 19:06
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7600U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 7.1
2-Core 7.6
4% 7.35 Pts
4-Core 6.8
8-Core 5.5
1% 6.15 Pts
64-Core 6.9
0% 6.9 Pts
Poor: 21% Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 5.2
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 154 114 95 123 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 193
Mixed 133
SusWrite 123
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 6.2
1,000% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 1.9
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 1,960
2% 1,960 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback