MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 20:09
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 893
87% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 175 189 194 182 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45% Average
Read 382
Write 172
Mixed 206
SusWrite 183
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 13.6
56% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 64
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 18.4
18% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 45%
Great: 313%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
162GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1535 927 822 507 403 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,334
Write 2,200
Mixed 1,182
SusWrite 741
360% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 45.6
181% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,149
DQ Write 592
DQ Mixed 1,026
721% 923 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 232%
Great: 370%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
320GB free
Firmware: GKAOA94A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 61.6
Write 69.7
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 79.4
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 3000 C16 Series CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3066, 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 36.3
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 36
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback