Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 115
2-Core 231
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 845
77% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1355 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 57
Parallax 92.7
58% 73.6 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 46.6
50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,966
Write 1,300
Mixed 527
277% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 63.7
214% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 689
563% 805 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
109GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 180 173 177 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 122
Write 174
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 175
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1
266% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 201%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
254GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 97 100 97 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 136
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 99.1
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 30.1
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback