Besstar DMAF5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemBesstar DMAF5  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR DMAF5
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 11:57
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 179
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 427
44% 354 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.8% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 14.5
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.1
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,268
Write 1,547
Mixed 1,391
315% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 56.3
177% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 696
518% 691 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
193GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 404
Write 82.3
Mixed 128
SusWrite 75.2
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 19.1
78% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 103
84% 123 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8K1A-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.3% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 27.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DMAF5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar DMAF5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback