Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 06:50
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 185
64% 115 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 506
50% 409 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 95.8
83% 102 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 101
Splatting 97
79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston Dean R2.1 480GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 197 198 156 96 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 408
Write 401
Mixed 350
SusWrite 167
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 31.2
102% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 145
130% 194 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
44GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 118 135 153 142 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 143
Write 112
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 125
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77%
Great: 109%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
81GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 62 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 70.5
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 60.6
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback