Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180212
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 25 '22 at 06:22
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 180
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 484
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 39.4
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 29
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston Dean R2.1 480GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 205 66 45 112 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 402
Write 399
Mixed 316
SusWrite 142
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 29.9
103% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 116
112% 176 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
44GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 119 133 153 141 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 112
Mixed 71
SusWrite 125
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 109%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
81GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 62 61 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 70.3
Write 67
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 60.9
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback